Wall Street Comments on the Fed’s June Meeting Minutes: Core Focus on Inflation, No Urgency for Near-Term Rate Hikes

The minutes of the Federal Reserve’s June meeting were released, and three major Wall Street institutions read the same signal from them—inflation is the real key determining whether interest rates will be raised.

The minutes of the Federal Reserve’s June FOMC meeting were published on July 8. The minutes showed that “all” participants supported keeping the federal funds rate unchanged in the 3.5%-3.75% range. While the market initially feared the minutes might be hawkish, after reading them, it generally interpreted them as marginally dovish—the reason being simple: the minutes showed no urgency for a rate hike in the near term.

According to sources from the trading desk, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup quickly released commentary reports after the minutes were published, with their core judgments highly consistent: the Fed’s current reaction function remains data-driven, and policy direction depends entirely on inflation data performance in the coming months.

The team led by Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius directly pointed out the core logic: The key dividing line in the minutes is whether inflation can begin to fall “soon.” If so, “almost all” officials discussing this scenario supported “maintaining or eventually lowering” rates; if not, similarly, “almost all” officials discussing the high-inflation scenario believed that “some degree of policy tightening might be necessary.”

Two paths, one key: inflation data.

“A Few” Saw Reasons for a Hike, But No One Really Wanted to Act

One of the most closely watched phrases in the minutes was that a “few” participants saw “reasons for a rate hike” at the June meeting.

However, Morgan Stanley’s chief US economist Michael Gapen explicitly stated that this is different from “leaning towards a rate hike.” He wrote: “These ‘few’ participants indicated that they were currently satisfied with keeping the policy rate at its current level.”

Citigroup economist Andrew Hollenhorst shared the same view. In his report, he cited the original language from the minutes, noting that these participants “expressed support for maintaining the current target range at this meeting.” In other words, even if some thought a rate hike was justified, no one was actually going to press that button at this juncture.

Notably, in the previous SEP dot plot, 9 officials projected a rate hike by 2026, with several expecting 2-3 hikes. However, judging by the language of the minutes, this hawkish leaning has yet to translate into a willingness to act.

This article is sourced from the internet: Wall Street Comments on the Fed’s June Meeting Minutes: Core Focus on Inflation, No Urgency for Near-Term Rate Hikes

Related: From Ethereum to AI‘s “CROPS”: What Exactly Are These “Slow Variables” Vitalik Keeps Emphasizing?

The systematic emergence of this concept can be traced back to March 13. The Ethereum Foundation Board published the “EF Mandate” document, explicitly stating that its primary focus will be on Ethereum’s censorship resistance, open source, privacy, and security – namely CROPS – serving user self-sovereignty while maintaining extractability resistance and a more seamless user experience. This statement is actually very important, especially as AI begins to enter wallet and automated execution scenarios, CROPS is no longer limited to Ethereum’s values but could potentially become the issue of whether users can continue to control their digital lives in the age of AI. 1. What Exactly is CROPS? To understand CROPS, one must first move past a common misconception. While Ethereum certainly needs to improve performance and reduce costs, its goal…