CoinEx Research: Geopolitical Tensions Drive Up Oil and Gold Prices, Crypto Market Absorbs Liquidity Shock
As tensions in the Middle East escalate once again, global markets are repricing geopolitical risks. The divergent performances of crude oil, gold, stocks, and криптовалюта assets reflect the different roles these asset classes play within the macro-financial system.
Oil Prices: The Core Channel for Risk Transmission
The latest escalation of conflict has sparked market concerns over potential supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, driving oil prices higher. This strait handles approximately one-fifth of global oil shipments, serving as a critical hub for the transmission of geopolitical risks to the global economy.
Rising oil prices not only impact energy costs but may also elevate inflation expectations and, through the bond market, affect global liquidity conditions. Currently, the upward movement in oil prices reflects more of a precautionary risk premium rather than actual supply disruptions.
Gold: The Classic Safe-Haven Asset Strengthens
Against the backdrop of heightened risk sentiment, gold is exhibiting classic safe-haven characteristics. Inflows of capital are supporting price increases, reflecting investors’ defensive allocation needs in anticipation of a further escalation of the conflict.
Future price movements will depend on how the situation evolves. If gold gives back its gains, it may signal a market perception of easing tensions; sustained strength, however, would indicate that safe-haven demand continues to grow.
Bitcoin: A Liquidity Outlet Under Pressure but Remains Resilient
During the weekend when news of the conflict unfolded, traditional markets were closed, making the crypto market the first trading venue to reflect the shift in risk sentiment. Bitcoin, as the world’s most liquid continuously traded asset, became the primary outlet for rapid de-risking.
Despite selling pressure, Bitcoin’s decline was relatively limited, holding around $66,000; Ethereum also experienced only a mild correction. This performance indicates that while the crypto market provided a liquidity outlet, no structural imbalances emerged.
The current market appears to view this conflict more as a temporary risk premium event rather than a systemic financial shock.
If the Conflict Escalates, What Are the Potential Impact Pathways?
If the situation further escalates, the market will focus on the following three transmission pathways:
- Supply Shock Risk — Sustained high oil prices could reignite inflation concerns;
- Tightening Liquidity — Rising energy costs could compress global economic liquidity;
- Rising Real Interest Rates — An increase in real yields typically puts pressure on risk assets.
In such an environment, gold is likely to maintain its strength, while risk assets, including crypto assets, may face greater volatility.
Structural Differences Between Mainland China and Hong Kong Рынокs
The recent volatility also highlights the structural differences between the Mainland China and Hong Kong markets.
The Chinese A-share market operates within a framework of capital controls, with an investor base dominated by domestic capital. Historically, policy intervention mechanisms have provided a degree of downside cushioning.
In contrast, Hong Kong, as an offshore market, is highly reliant on international institutional capital. When global investors reduce their China-related risk exposure, they typically prioritize reducing positions through the Hong Kong market first, leading to relatively higher volatility.
This difference stems more from market structure than from fundamentals themselves.
Key Variables Currently Monitored by the Market
Traders are currently closely watching:
- Whether the conflict escalates further or shows signs of easing;
- Whether oil prices remain elevated;
- Whether gold continues its safe-haven strength;
- How global equity markets digest the geopolitical shock upon resuming full trading.
If oil and gold prices retreat, the market may define this volatility as a short-term geopolitical risk premium. If energy and safe-haven assets continue to strengthen, it could evolve into more persistent macro pressure on risk assets.
For now, market sentiment remains cautious, but there are no signs of systemic panic.
About CoinEx
Founded in 2017, CoinEx is an award-winning cryptocurrency exchange built with a user-centric philosophy. Since its inception by the industry-leading mining pool ViaBTC, CoinEx has been one of the early adopters in the industry to publish Proof of Reserves, ensuring 100% user asset protection.
Currently, CoinEx serves over 10 million users across more than 200 countries and regions worldwide, supporting trading for over 1,100 crypto assets, and is equipped with professional-grade product features and a service system.
CoinEx has also issued its native platform token, CET, to incentivize user participation in ecosystem development and continuously empower the growth of the platform’s ecosystem.
Эта статья взята из интернета: CoinEx Research: Geopolitical Tensions Drive Up Oil and Gold Prices, Crypto Market Absorbs Liquidity Shock
Price Structure Under Pressure: Selling Pressure Not from Institutions, but Dispersed Speculative Losses Over the past six months, Bitcoin has failed to strengthen in sync with gold and other risk assets. Since June 2025, sustained selling by early holders was once considered the primary suppressing factor. However, starting in October, as gold accelerated its upward move and Bitcoin entered a correction, it became clear that a single factor could no longer explain the current divergence. The flash crash on October 10, 2025, served as a significant watershed. This event led to a notable widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange price spreads, squeezing the risk budgets of market makers and market-neutral capital, thereby weakening short-term liquidity. It is noteworthy that there is little indication of concentrated losses among major trading…






