icon_install_ios_web icon_install_ios_web icon_install_android_web

HYPE ETF attracted $160 million in its first month: Wall Street is betting on the chain-based exchange, not the altcoin

分析8小時前發佈 lywt
673 0

Original Translation: TechFlow

長話短說: HYPE ETFs have attracted $161 million in net inflows within a month of launch, with almost zero redemptions. This is not another round of altcoin hype—investors are buying into the cash flow of Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX): $240 billion in monthly trading volume, nearly $900 million in annualized revenue, and 99% of fees used to repurchase tokens. For investors and practitioners, this signals a shift in 加密貨幣 asset narratives from “tech concepts” to “auditable business models,” and is a sign that traditional finance is beginning to price on-chain protocols like exchange stocks.

One month after THYP’s Nasdaq listing, three US spot HYPE ETFs have attracted $161 million in net inflows.

June 5 was the only trading day with redemptions, seeing $2.9 million outflow from BHYP, while every other trading day closed in the green.

The clean flow record partly reflects the access mechanism—Hyperliquid restricts US user access to its platform, making broker-listed ETFs the only avenue for US investors to hold HYPE without using non-custodial wallets.

A more enduring driver comes from the asset itself: a derivatives trading platform with auditable usage metrics, a fee-based token buyback mechanism, and a platform already processing hundreds of billions in monthly volume.

The Business Behind the 代幣

Data from DefiLlama shows 30-day perpetual contract volume at $240.5 billion, 7-day volume at $72.4 billion, and 24-hour volume at $9.4 billion, with cumulative perpetual contract volume reaching $4.663 trillion.

Current open interest stands at $8.6 billion, with annualized fees exceeding $1 billion and annualized revenue approaching $886 million.

CoinGlass reports Q1 derivatives volume near $493 billion, while DefiLlama’s cumulative figure has risen to approximately $443 billion. 21Shares cited a figure of $4.22 trillion when THYP launched in mid-May.

DefiLlama’s fee methodology shows that 99% of Hyperliquid perpetual contract fees flow into the Assistance Fund to repurchase HYPE tokens, excluding builder fees. BHYP issuer Bitwise describes this as “nearly all” transaction revenue being recycled into open market buybacks.

This structure allows ETF issuers to pitch HYPE much like stock analysts pitch exchange stocks—higher trading volume generates higher fees, higher fees fund more buybacks, and more buybacks tighten the circulating supply.

BHYP’s own page reports $93.53 million in assets under management as of June 10, holding 1.587 million HYPE, with a total staking reward rate of 2.25%, a net staking reward rate of 1.18%, and 70% of assets currently staked.

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan told CNBC that the market has “only penetrated 1% of its potential,” adding that most investors still don’t know what Hyperliquid is.

Presto Research Head of Research Peter Chung observed that early data shows institutions are flowing into HYPE ETFs faster than Bitcoin ETFs on a market-cap-adjusted basis.

HYPE itself hit an all-time high of $75.48 on June 2, up approximately 160% year-to-date. It is currently trading around $61, placing the protocol’s fully diluted valuation near $69 billion.

Why This ETF Story is Different

The Solana ETF narrative centers on network activity and developer adoption, while the XRP ETF narrative focuses on payment utility and legal clarity.

The HYPE ETF offers exposure to the partial equity of an exchange’s cash flow engine, with visible metrics for volume, open interest, fees, revenue, and a buyback mechanism directly tied to trading activity.

HIP-3, Hyperliquid’s permissionless framework for launching perpetual futures on any asset with a price feed, has already reduced cryptocurrency’s share of total trading volume from roughly 90% to about 65%.

On certain days, five of the top ten assets by volume are now traditional markets: the S&P 500 (via a licensing agreement with S&P Dow Jones Indices), Silver, Nasdaq 100, WTI Crude Oil, and Brent Crude Oil.

HIP-3 open interest reached $1.7 billion in mid-May, up over 150% from February. The largest HIP-3 deployer, Trade.xyz, a product of Hyperliquid’s own tokenization unit Hyperunit, accounts for $1.58 billion of this total and has processed over $100 billion in volume since October 2025.

This revenue diversification directly strengthens the bullish case for the exchange capturing oil, equity index, and silver volume, as it helps sustain the fee run-rate.

How the 交換 Stock Thesis Works or Fails

If Hyperliquid’s 30-day perpetual volume stays above $200 billion, keeping annualized revenue near its current $885 million run-rate, or climbing to $1.2 billion as 21Shares projects in its bull case, the bullish thesis holds.

ETF inflows become a persistent third demand channel alongside organic staking and protocol buybacks. HIP-3 open interest breaks $3 billion, and HYPE trades more like a high-growth exchange asset than a high-beta DeFi token.

The bearish scenario begins with monthly volume collapsing below $150 billion, pulling annualized revenue into the $350-450 million range modeled by 21Shares in its bear case, implying a token price in the $15-19 range.

At lower revenue run-rates, token unlocks could outpace buyback demand. Given HYPE’s concentrated circulating supply, ETF outflows would amplify price downside.

The only persistent outflow day so far caused no observable price damage, but if the scale increased tenfold, this ratio would look very different.

What the Risks Look Like Inside the Prospectus

Bitwise’s BHYP filing classifies the fund outside the 1940 Act, noting that staking introduces slashing risk, reward loss risk, and redemption timing risk. 21Shares flags centralization risk, validator attack vectors, and regulatory uncertainty.

Both issuers position HYPE as speculative exposure to an early-stage trading platform, distinct from regulated exchanges.

The platform competes with centralized exchanges that have deeper liquidity and compliance infrastructure, and depends on the willingness of builders to continue deploying HIP-3 markets at scale.

Hyperliquid became a 24/7 macro trading platform, in part, because the US-Iran conflict last summer led traders to scramble for oil exposure over the weekend when traditional futures exchanges were closed.

That growth event brought the platform directly into the sights of commodities regulators, who have historically been aggressive regarding jurisdiction.

An enforcement headline targeting commodity perpetuals or tokenized stocks on the platform would hit the revenue base that the ETF pitch relies on.

The next test is whether ETF inflows can hold as HYPE’s year-to-date outperformance matures and early buyers consider taking profits.

Bitwise has committed to using 10% of BHYP management fees to purchase and stake HYPE on its own balance sheet, adding a structural demand floor linked to AUM.

Whether this, combined with the protocol’s buyback engine, is enough to absorb future unlock-driven selling depends entirely on whether the volume figures underpinning the thesis continue to materialize.

本文源自網路: HYPE ETF attracted $160 million in its first month: Wall Street is betting on the chain-based exchange, not the altcoin

Related: Bitcoin’s “Bounce Has Ended,” Formally Entering Late Bear 市場 Phase?

Original Translation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News Bitcoin fell 13% this week, with profitability collapsing sharply, realized losses surging, and spot sellers regaining control. US spot ETF investors, having faced resistance near their cost basis, have fallen back into unrealized losses, while the options market continues to price in high risk. Summary Bitcoin fell 13% over the past 7 days, with the price retreating to a position between the realized price and the true market mean. The short-term holder cost basis dropped below the true market mean for the first time (since January 2022), confirming late-stage bear market characteristics. The 7-day moving average of the realized profit-loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, almost mirroring the February panic sell-off. Meanwhile, the 90-day moving average never broke the threshold…

© 版權聲明

相關文章